Before calling "attach" a screen object is just a dummy container for
(row, col) values whose purpose is to be sent as part of the "attach"
function call anyway.
Just create the screen in an attached state directly. Keep the complete
(row, col, options) config together. It is still completely valid to
later detach and re-attach as needed, including to another session.
This reduces the number of nil checks around buf_versions usage
Test changes were lifted from 5c33815
Co-authored-by: Mathias Fussenegger <f.mathias@zignar.net>
* Revert "fix(lsp): account for changedtick version gap on modified reset (#29170)"
This reverts commit 2e6d295f79.
* Revert "refactor(lsp): replace util.buf_versions with changedtick (#28943)"
This reverts commit 5c33815448.
`lsp.util.buf_versions` was already derived from changedtick (`on_lines`
from `buf_attach` synced the version)
As far as I can tell there is no need to keep track of the state in a
separate table.
Specifically, functions that are run in the context of the test runner
are put in module `test/testutil.lua` while the functions that are run
in the context of the test session are put in
`test/functional/testnvim.lua`.
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
`exec_lua` makes code slighly harder to read, so it's beneficial to
remove it in cases where it's possible or convenient.
Not all `exec_lua` calls should be removed even if the test passes as it
changes the semantics of the test even if it happens to pass.
From https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/28155#discussion_r1548185779:
"Note for tests like this, which fundamentally are about conversion, you
end up changing what conversion you are testing. Even if the result
happens to be same (as they often are, as we like the rules to be
consistent if possible), you are now testing the RPC conversion rules
instead of the vim script to in-process lua conversion rules."
From https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/28155#discussion_r1548190152:
"A test like this specifies that the cursor is valid immediately and not
after a separate cycle of normal (or an other input-processing) mode."
Added the following LSP semantic token types to be linked to highlight
groups by default:
* @lsp.type.event
* @lsp.type.keyword
* @lsp.type.modifier
* @lsp.type.number
* @lsp.type.operator
* @lsp.type.regexp
* @lsp.type.string
This is the command invoked repeatedly to make the changes:
:%s/^\(.*\)|\%(\*\(\d\+\)\)\?$\n\1|\%(\*\(\d\+\)\)\?$/\=submatch(1)..'|*'..(max([str2nr(submatch(2)),1])+max([str2nr(submatch(3)),1]))/g
feat(lsp)!: change semantic token highlighting
Change the default highlights used, and add more highlights per token.
Add an LspTokenUpdate event and a highlight_token function.
:Inspect now shows any highlights applied by token highlighting rules,
default or user-defined.
BREAKING CHANGE: change the default highlight groups used by semantic
token highlighting.
redraw! redraws the entire screen instead of just the windows with
the buffer which were actually changed.
I considered trying to calculating the range for the delta
but it looks tricky. Could a follow-up.
Apply semantic token modifiers as separate extmarks with corresponding
highlight groups (e.g., `@readonly`). This is a low-effort PR to enable
the most common use cases (applying, e.g., italics or backgrounds on top
of type highlights; language-specific fallbacks like `@global.lua` are
also available). This can be replaced by more complicated selector-style
themes later on.
Instead of testing for every possible modifier type, only test bits up
to the highest set in the token array. Saves many bit ops and
comparisons when there are no modifiers or when the highest set bit is a
lower bit than the highest possible in the legend on average.
Can be further simplified when non-luaJIT gets the full bit module (see #21222)
The spec indicates that the response may be `null`, but it doesn't
really say what a `null` response means. Since neovim raises an error if
the response is `null`, I figured that ignoring it would be the safest
bet.
Co-authored-by: Mathias Fussenegger <f.mathias@zignar.net>
1. The algorithm for applying edits was slightly incorrect. It needs to
preserve the original token list as the edits are applied instead of
mutating it as it iterates. From the spec:
Semantic token edits behave conceptually like text edits on
documents: if an edit description consists of n edits all n edits are
based on the same state Sm of the number array. They will move the
number array from state Sm to Sm+1.
2. Schedule the semantic token engine start() call in the
client._on_attach() function so that users who schedule_wrap() their
config.on_attach() functions (like nvim-lspconfig does) can still
disable semantic tokens by deleting the semanticTokensProvider from
their server capabilities.
* credit to @smolck and @theHamsta for their contributions in laying the
groundwork for this feature and for their work on some of the helper
utility functions and tests
