Problem:
`vim.version.range('>=0.10'):has('0.12.0-dev')` returns false, which is
wrong per semver.
Solution:
`vim.VersionRange:has()` shouldn't have special handling for prereleases
(Why would we need it when `__eq`, `__lt`, `__le` already handle
prereleases?).
Closes#33316
Specifically, functions that are run in the context of the test runner
are put in module `test/testutil.lua` while the functions that are run
in the context of the test session are put in
`test/functional/testnvim.lua`.
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
`exec_lua` makes code slighly harder to read, so it's beneficial to
remove it in cases where it's possible or convenient.
Not all `exec_lua` calls should be removed even if the test passes as it
changes the semantics of the test even if it happens to pass.
From https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/28155#discussion_r1548185779:
"Note for tests like this, which fundamentally are about conversion, you
end up changing what conversion you are testing. Even if the result
happens to be same (as they often are, as we like the rules to be
consistent if possible), you are now testing the RPC conversion rules
instead of the vim script to in-process lua conversion rules."
From https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/28155#discussion_r1548190152:
"A test like this specifies that the cursor is valid immediately and not
after a separate cycle of normal (or an other input-processing) mode."
- Problem: One cannot easily write something like, for example:
`version_current >= {0, 10, 0}`; writing like
`not vim.version.lt(version_current, {0, 10, 0})` is verbose.
- Solution: add {`le`,`ge`} in addition to {`lt`,`gt`}.
- Also improve typing on the operator methods: allow `string` as well.
- Update the example in `vim.version.range()` docs: `ge` in place of
`gt` better matches the semantics of `range:has`.
vim.version.range() couldn't parse them correctly.
For example, vim.version.range('<0.9.0'):has('0.9.0') returned `true`.
fix: range:has() accepts vim.version()
So that it's possible to compare a range with:
vim.version.range(spec):has(vim.version())
Problem:
semver specifies that digit sequences in a prerelease string should be
compared as numbers, not lexically: https://semver.org/#spec-item-11
> Precedence for two pre-release versions with the same major, minor,
> and patch version MUST be determined by comparing each dot separated
> identifier from left to right until a difference is found as follows:
> 1. Identifiers consisting of only digits are compared numerically.
> 2. Identifiers with letters or hyphens are compared lexically in ASCII sort order.
> 3. Numeric identifiers always have lower precedence than non-numeric identifiers.
> 4. A larger set of pre-release fields has a higher precedence than a smaller set, if all of the preceding identifiers are equal.
Example:
1.0.0-alpha < 1.0.0-alpha.1 < 1.0.0-alpha.beta < 1.0.0-beta < 1.0.0-beta.2 < 1.0.0-beta.11 < 1.0.0-rc.1 < 1.0.0.
Solution:
cmp_prerel() treats all digit sequences in a prerelease string as
numbers. This doesn't _exactly_ match the spec, which specifies that
only dot-delimited digit sequences should be treated as numbers...
Problem:
"tmux 3.2a" (output from "tmux -V") is not parsed easily.
Solution:
With `strict=false`, discard everything before the first digit.
- rename Semver => Version
- rename vim.version.version() => vim.version._version()
- rename matches() => has()
- remove `opts` from cmp()
Problem:
If major<major but minor>minor, cmp_version_core returns 1
Solution:
- Fix logic in cmp_version_core
- Delete most eq()/gt()/lt() tests, they are redundant.
- version.cmp(): assert valid version
- add test for loading vim.version (the other tests use shared.lua in
the test runner)
- reduce test scopes, reword test descriptions
